This is some decent toilet paper for the price. For starters this is a bit softer than 1 ply although I used to use like...half ply so that isn't that great of a comparison. Perhaps one should consider this 1.5 ply, not crazy soft, not crazy sandpapery. It holds together pretty well, flushes without issues, it really gets the job done.
Just like other toilet paper brands, you almost have to use a spreadsheet to do the math on what you're getting and just like every other time I have bought toilet paper on Amazon, this has changed slightly since the last time I bought it. It went from 24 rolls at $8.49 to 48 at $14.62. I'm not 100% sure if the 24 were the whole "double roll" thing when I first bought them because the new product page took over the old one. The picture in my history says for the old product says "24 Family Rolls = 50 regular rolls" so I would assume I bought 48 rolls before. What I can tell you looking at the current product page is they are using double rolls so you get 96 rolls with this product. At 264 sheets per roll you're looking at 25,344 sheets. I would say 3-4 sheets is needed per use so if you use 4 every time that's 6,336 uses, because the cost per sheet is too low of a number for me to want to work with, you're looking at $0.002 per use. For one person, this is probably enough to last a year.
Compare this to my second choice,
Charmin Ultra Strong Toilet Paper, Bath Tissue, Double Roll, 48 Count
which at the moment is not available via Subscribe & Save, is $27.40, and you get 96 rolls, 154 sheets per roll, 14,784 sheets total. I would say 2 sheets is needed per use, that's 7,392 uses, $0.003 per use. Quick note, if you strictly follow the 2 sheet per use roll, you won't need to change the rolls out as much compared to the Scott, by my calculations you get 77 uses per roll vs. 66 on the Scott. If you get lazy and end up using more sheet per use, you're not making the most of your purchase. It does appear the dimensions of the sheets are about the same so I will ignore going into that. Another downside of this product is when you open the package, Charmin individually wraps the quadruple rolls which takes extra time to unwrap. On the plus side, Charmin ultra strong is more comfortable than this Scott product so if you factor in the slight increase in cost for comfort and quality you may want to go with this instead.
Going back to product pages for toilet paper changes on you so you cannot just order the same thing as before and be happy, it seems the quality has improved on this since I last bought it. If you look at the attached picture, you may notice because there is no tube, the hole where you would mount the roll needs to be expanded before threading it through the holder. This caused it to sit unevenly which was annoying especially since they go over the top mentioning how great this toilet paper is without the "pesky" tube. The tubeless aspect of this product is a gimmick, I just bought it because it was cheaper and wasn't terrible quality. I'm glad the new product doesn't have this problem with the "pre rounded hole".
I hope this helps, I give it 5 stars because of the value, it surely isn't the best but I feel I get my money's worth.
There is a newer version of this item:
Scott ComfortPlus Toilet Paper, 24 Double Rolls, Bath Tissue
$32.50 ($0.59 / 100 Sheets)
(4,612)
Only 10 left in stock - order soon.
$32.50 ($0.59 / 100 Sheets)
(4,612)
Only 10 left in stock - order soon.
Add a debit or credit card to save time when you check out
Convenient and secure with 2 clicks. Add your card
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Climate Pledge FriendlyProducts with trusted sustainability certification(s). Learn morePRODUCT CERTIFICATION (1)
The Forest Stewardship Council certified products support responsible forestry, helping keep forests healthy for future generations.
Climate Pledge FriendlyProducts with trusted sustainability certification(s). Learn morePRODUCT CERTIFICATION (1)
GreenCircle Certified: Certified Environmental Facts Label verifies product carbon footprint reduction in the raw material or manufacturing stage.
Climate Pledge FriendlyProducts with trusted sustainability certification(s). Learn morePRODUCT CERTIFICATION (1)
The Forest Stewardship Council certified products support responsible forestry, helping keep forests healthy for future generations.
Climate Pledge FriendlyProducts with trusted sustainability certification(s). Learn morePRODUCT CERTIFICATION (1)
The Forest Stewardship Council certified products support responsible forestry, helping keep forests healthy for future generations.
Reviews with images
Decent Toilet Paper, slight improvements over the last time I bought it
This is some decent toilet paper for the price. For starters this is a bit softer than 1 ply although I used to use like...half ply so that isn't that great of a comparison. Perhaps one should consider this 1.5 ply, not crazy soft, not crazy sandpapery. It holds together pretty well, flushes without issues, it really gets the job done.Just like other toilet paper brands, you almost have to use a spreadsheet to do the math on what you're getting and just like every other time I have bought toilet paper on Amazon, this has changed slightly since the last time I bought it. It went from 24 rolls at $8.49 to 48 at $14.62. I'm not 100% sure if the 24 were the whole "double roll" thing when I first bought them because the new product page took over the old one. The picture in my history says for the old product says "24 Family Rolls = 50 regular rolls" so I would assume I bought 48 rolls before. What I can tell you looking at the current product page is they are using double rolls so you get 96 rolls with this product. At 264 sheets per roll you're looking at 25,344 sheets. I would say 3-4 sheets is needed per use so if you use 4 every time that's 6,336 uses, because the cost per sheet is too low of a number for me to want to work with, you're looking at $0.002 per use. For one person, this is probably enough to last a year.Compare this to my second choice, Charmin Ultra Strong Toilet Paper, Bath Tissue, Double Roll, 48 Count which at the moment is not available via Subscribe & Save, is $27.40, and you get 96 rolls, 154 sheets per roll, 14,784 sheets total. I would say 2 sheets is needed per use, that's 7,392 uses, $0.003 per use. Quick note, if you strictly follow the 2 sheet per use roll, you won't need to change the rolls out as much compared to the Scott, by my calculations you get 77 uses per roll vs. 66 on the Scott. If you get lazy and end up using more sheet per use, you're not making the most of your purchase. It does appear the dimensions of the sheets are about the same so I will ignore going into that. Another downside of this product is when you open the package, Charmin individually wraps the quadruple rolls which takes extra time to unwrap. On the plus side, Charmin ultra strong is more comfortable than this Scott product so if you factor in the slight increase in cost for comfort and quality you may want to go with this instead.Going back to product pages for toilet paper changes on you so you cannot just order the same thing as before and be happy, it seems the quality has improved on this since I last bought it. If you look at the attached picture, you may notice because there is no tube, the hole where you would mount the roll needs to be expanded before threading it through the holder. This caused it to sit unevenly which was annoying especially since they go over the top mentioning how great this toilet paper is without the "pesky" tube. The tubeless aspect of this product is a gimmick, I just bought it because it was cheaper and wasn't terrible quality. I'm glad the new product doesn't have this problem with the "pre rounded hole".I hope this helps, I give it 5 stars because of the value, it surely isn't the best but I feel I get my money's worth.
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2017
Just like other toilet paper brands, you almost have to use a spreadsheet to do the math on what you're getting and just like every other time I have bought toilet paper on Amazon, this has changed slightly since the last time I bought it. It went from 24 rolls at $8.49 to 48 at $14.62. I'm not 100% sure if the 24 were the whole "double roll" thing when I first bought them because the new product page took over the old one. The picture in my history says for the old product says "24 Family Rolls = 50 regular rolls" so I would assume I bought 48 rolls before. What I can tell you looking at the current product page is they are using double rolls so you get 96 rolls with this product. At 264 sheets per roll you're looking at 25,344 sheets. I would say 3-4 sheets is needed per use so if you use 4 every time that's 6,336 uses, because the cost per sheet is too low of a number for me to want to work with, you're looking at $0.002 per use. For one person, this is probably enough to last a year.
Compare this to my second choice, [[ASIN:B00YMVI4GK Charmin Ultra Strong Toilet Paper, Bath Tissue, Double Roll, 48 Count]] which at the moment is not available via Subscribe & Save, is $27.40, and you get 96 rolls, 154 sheets per roll, 14,784 sheets total. I would say 2 sheets is needed per use, that's 7,392 uses, $0.003 per use. Quick note, if you strictly follow the 2 sheet per use roll, you won't need to change the rolls out as much compared to the Scott, by my calculations you get 77 uses per roll vs. 66 on the Scott. If you get lazy and end up using more sheet per use, you're not making the most of your purchase. It does appear the dimensions of the sheets are about the same so I will ignore going into that. Another downside of this product is when you open the package, Charmin individually wraps the quadruple rolls which takes extra time to unwrap. On the plus side, Charmin ultra strong is more comfortable than this Scott product so if you factor in the slight increase in cost for comfort and quality you may want to go with this instead.
Going back to product pages for toilet paper changes on you so you cannot just order the same thing as before and be happy, it seems the quality has improved on this since I last bought it. If you look at the attached picture, you may notice because there is no tube, the hole where you would mount the roll needs to be expanded before threading it through the holder. This caused it to sit unevenly which was annoying especially since they go over the top mentioning how great this toilet paper is without the "pesky" tube. The tubeless aspect of this product is a gimmick, I just bought it because it was cheaper and wasn't terrible quality. I'm glad the new product doesn't have this problem with the "pre rounded hole".
I hope this helps, I give it 5 stars because of the value, it surely isn't the best but I feel I get my money's worth.
Decent Toilet Paper, slight improvements over the last time I bought it
Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2017
This is some decent toilet paper for the price. For starters this is a bit softer than 1 ply although I used to use like...half ply so that isn't that great of a comparison. Perhaps one should consider this 1.5 ply, not crazy soft, not crazy sandpapery. It holds together pretty well, flushes without issues, it really gets the job done.Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2017
Just like other toilet paper brands, you almost have to use a spreadsheet to do the math on what you're getting and just like every other time I have bought toilet paper on Amazon, this has changed slightly since the last time I bought it. It went from 24 rolls at $8.49 to 48 at $14.62. I'm not 100% sure if the 24 were the whole "double roll" thing when I first bought them because the new product page took over the old one. The picture in my history says for the old product says "24 Family Rolls = 50 regular rolls" so I would assume I bought 48 rolls before. What I can tell you looking at the current product page is they are using double rolls so you get 96 rolls with this product. At 264 sheets per roll you're looking at 25,344 sheets. I would say 3-4 sheets is needed per use so if you use 4 every time that's 6,336 uses, because the cost per sheet is too low of a number for me to want to work with, you're looking at $0.002 per use. For one person, this is probably enough to last a year.
Compare this to my second choice, [[ASIN:B00YMVI4GK Charmin Ultra Strong Toilet Paper, Bath Tissue, Double Roll, 48 Count]] which at the moment is not available via Subscribe & Save, is $27.40, and you get 96 rolls, 154 sheets per roll, 14,784 sheets total. I would say 2 sheets is needed per use, that's 7,392 uses, $0.003 per use. Quick note, if you strictly follow the 2 sheet per use roll, you won't need to change the rolls out as much compared to the Scott, by my calculations you get 77 uses per roll vs. 66 on the Scott. If you get lazy and end up using more sheet per use, you're not making the most of your purchase. It does appear the dimensions of the sheets are about the same so I will ignore going into that. Another downside of this product is when you open the package, Charmin individually wraps the quadruple rolls which takes extra time to unwrap. On the plus side, Charmin ultra strong is more comfortable than this Scott product so if you factor in the slight increase in cost for comfort and quality you may want to go with this instead.
Going back to product pages for toilet paper changes on you so you cannot just order the same thing as before and be happy, it seems the quality has improved on this since I last bought it. If you look at the attached picture, you may notice because there is no tube, the hole where you would mount the roll needs to be expanded before threading it through the holder. This caused it to sit unevenly which was annoying especially since they go over the top mentioning how great this toilet paper is without the "pesky" tube. The tubeless aspect of this product is a gimmick, I just bought it because it was cheaper and wasn't terrible quality. I'm glad the new product doesn't have this problem with the "pre rounded hole".
I hope this helps, I give it 5 stars because of the value, it surely isn't the best but I feel I get my money's worth.
Images in this review
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2018
Reviewed in the United States on April 17, 2016
Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2016
Top reviews from other countries
Oksana Delgado
Product is perfectly fine. Will not be ordering again due to the ...
Reviewed in Canada on May 24, 2018
Exeter
Sheets are not as wide as my previous brand, ...
Reviewed in Canada on February 22, 2018